CommodityServers
Grids are "clusters of clusters". Built up as farms of commodity
servers they represent an alternative to the large chassis full of SMP
(Symmetrical Multi-Processing) blades. Along with the usual high availability
benefits of normal clusters, such grids support fine grained scalability tuning
by adding or removing a few or many servers as needed.
The motivators all deal with money. Yahoo or Amazon (I'm still looking for a
link to help me remember which) did detailed computations of power consumption,
heat emission, floor space, deployment, reliability and management and concluded
that "more and smaller" servers made the best sense. They have such
large farms that they expect to "lose" one or two servers every day to
unrecoverable hardware failure. On pure cost/benefit reasoning, it's not worth
the effort to pull the dead ones out of the racks. They just add more on the
other end.
A LAMPInfrastructure makes it easier
and cheaper to manage huge numbers of servers.
Who's Doing This?
- Hotmail, Yahoo and Google, maybe Amazon. Still looking for links.
- Oracle
describes their grid technology.
- IBM describes DB2
ICE clusters on SuSE Linux. 64-bit processers become more important in
database land.
- From GridBus:
Some examples of commercial applications that use these platforms: web
servers (e.g., hotmail.com, yahoo.com), search engines (e.g., google.com is
driven by a 4500 nodes Linux PC cluster), database engines (e.g., high-end
oracle database server), financial modelling, peer-to-peer content sharing
(e.g., napster) , and web-content delivery (e.g., Akamai's world wide
network of clusters delivers major web contents, e.g., cnn.com, from the
nearest webserver transparently).
From the IT
Manager's Journal: "Google is now rumored to be running more than
100,000 Linux servers, and laying plans to leverage its server infrastructure in
ways that extend far beyond search."
From ZDNet: "Amazon said in
June [2001] that it was revamping its computer systems and switching to
"commodity" computers running Linux. Executives said at the time that
they expected technology costs as a portion of net sales would decrease by 20
percent this year.
Copyright 2001-2005, Jim Standley